tortious act is
committed by a public servant and it gives
rise to a claim for damages, the question to
ask is : Was the tortious ... damages for loss caused by
such tortious act will not lie. On the other
hand, if the tortious act has been committed
by a public
Jay Engineering Works Ltd. And Ors. vs State Of West Bengal And Ors. on 29
disposal was passed by a Magistrate would not in any way interfere with or wipe away the right of the owner to demand the return ... contention that the State Government is not liable for any tortious act of its servants can possibly arise. The decisions in 1962 Supp
disposal was passed by a Magistrate . would not in any way interfere with or wipe away the right of the owner to demand the return ... contention that the State Government is not liable for any tortious act of its servants can possibly arise.
and lastly held that the two decisions
ghtest interference with the body or use of force to compel the furnishing of even non-commu- P '
nicative material requires a statutory authority ... absence of which such action would
prima facie attract tortious liability. Once this aspect is borne in mind, the need for clear
and speciļ¬c statutory
Prathvi Raj Chauhan vs Union Of India on 10 February, 2020
Equivalent citations: AIR 2020
Union Of India vs The State Of Maharashtra on 1 October, 2019
Equivalent citations: AIR
Sunkara Satyanarayana vs State Of Andhra Pradesh, Home ... on 15 October, 1999
Equivalent citations: 2000
Mr. Roy Joseph Creado, Mr. Anil ... vs Sk. Tamisuddin S/O Late Sk. Nazir Ahmed
damages for loss caused by such tortious act will
not lie. On the other hand, if the tortious act has been
committed by a -public ... mind in discussing questions
of the State's liability arising from tortious acts
committed by public servants. That is why the clarity and
precision
