facts are made by both the courts
below, this Court cannot interfere with such findings of facts
in the Second Appeal.
10. Therefore, as rightly ... when it is a
case of tortious liability. There is absolutely nothing to
RSA.416/2010
: 10 :
interfere with the quantification made by the lower
facts are made by both the courts
below, this Court cannot interfere with such findings of facts
in the Second Appeal.
10. Therefore, as rightly ... when it is a
case of tortious liability. There is absolutely nothing to
RSA.416/2010
: 10 :
interfere with the quantification made by the lower
legally correct and I find no reason to interfere
with the reasoning that in a tortious liability the question as to
who was the aggressor ... plaintiffs/respondents.
RSA No.1189/2017 5
I find no reason to interfere with the findings. There is no
substantial question of law arising
Ghisalal Durga Dutta vs Bina Das And Ors. on 1 January, 1800
Equivalent citations: I
Colgate-Palmolive (India) Limited vs Anchor Health & Beauty Care Private Ltd
Author: V. Ramasubramanian
Ms.Kadek Dwi Ani Rasmini vs Mr.K.Natarajan
Author: N. Anand Venkatesh
Bench: N
Vedanta Limited vs State Of Tamil Nadu
Author: T.S.Sivagnanam
Bench: T.S.Sivagnanam
Hindustan Unilever Limited vs S.Shanthi
Bench: Sanjib Banerjee , P.D.Audikesavalu
OSA No.230
Hindustan Unilever Limited vs S.Shanthi
Bench: Sanjib Banerjee , P.D.Audikesavalu
OSA No.230
Reckitt Benckiser (India) Private ... vs Itc Limited
Author: M.Duraiswamy
Bench: M.Duraiswamy , T.V
