such as Amazon, Snapdeal, Flipkart, 1MG, and
Healthkart are guilty of tortious interference with
the contractual relationship of the Plaintiffs with
their distributors/direct sellers ... also violative of
Amway‟s intellectual property rights, and also constituted tortious
interference with Amway‟s Direct Selling Agreements with its
distributors;
That the sale
judicial review of an administrative
action is very limited and any interference by the High Court would be
required only when the impugned decision ... defendants as master
of his servant would be responsible for his tortious act. It has been further
contended that in the case of United Africa
ground of vicarious liability - Appellant Bank
refusing payment of money for tortious acts of its
officials and contended that respondent complainant
had already withdrawn ... amount - All fora
below concurrently holding that appellant Bank was
respondent complaint - Interference with - Held,
concurrent findings recorded by Consumer Fora did not
suffer from
colly) establishes
that the defendant had threatened to illegally interfere in the peaceful
possession of the plaintiff qua the suit property.
8. Further, I find ... because
'damages' are awarded by a Court, in cases of tortious liability or in case of a
Civil Suit No.1298/17
Vinod
Union Of India vs The State Of Maharashtra on 1 October, 2019
Equivalent citations: AIR
Smt. Savitri Devi W/O Khani Lal Pasi vs State Of U.P. Thru Home
U.P.State Food & Essential Commodities ... vs M/S Astha Coal Trading (Private) Ltd
Aakash Exploration Services Limited ... vs Oil And Natural Gas Corporation Limited on 21 June, 2019
Tata Chemicals Ltd vs M/S Kshitish Bardhan Chunilal Nath And ... on 17 July, 2019
S.Vijayashankar vs The State Of Tamil Nadu on 4 September, 2019
Equivalent citations: AIRONLINE
