subject contracts nor any pleadings are
made about the alleged tortious interference, much less, any
ingredients are set in. It is further submitted that
default) against defendant Palaniswamy
Veeraraja on complaint count III (Accounting:
Tortious interference with contract) ("Motion")
due notice having been given, the court having ... Veeraraja (sometimes also spelled
"Veeraraja") on Count III (accounting: Tortious
interference with contract0 of plaintiff's
complaint, in the total original judgement
Five crores) to the Complainant as damages in respect
of the tortious interference with and willful actions of the Respondent to
negate the value
incident is of the year 2007; liability is tortious; disputed facts are involved.
2. Interference claimed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India
scandalizes or tends to scandalize the authority of the
court, prejudices or interferes with judicial proceedings, or obstructs the
Signature Not Verified
CS(COMM ... manner. The miscommunication did not undermine the
authority of the court or interfere with its proceedings. Given these
considerations, the Plaintiff's conduct, while
standards to compute loss unlike in the case of damages. Hence,
any interference by the Appellate Courts should ordinarily be
allowed only when the compensation ... contemporaneous position of an individual which is essentially
forward-looking. Unlike tortious liability, which is chiefly
concerned with making up for the past and reinstating
standards
to compute loss unlike in the case of damages. Hence,
any interference by the Appellate Courts should
ordinarily be allowed only when the compensation ... contemporaneous position of an
individual which is essentially forward-looking. Unlike
tortious liability, which is chiefly concerned with making
up for the past and reinstating
standards to compute loss unlike in the case of damages. Hence,
any interference by the Appellate Courts should ordinarily be
allowed only when the compensation ... contemporaneous position of an individual which is essentially
forward-looking. Unlike tortious liability, which is chiefly
concerned with making up for the past and reinstating
observing that, it should not be understood that in every
case of tortious liability, recourse must be had to a suit. When there is
negligence ... view of the limited examination above, we find no reasons to
interfere with the impugned judgement and resultantly, dismiss the appeal
along with pending applications
Vehicles Act, 1988 and the Rules is a beneficial legislation whereby
the tortious liability of that nature has been codified in a manner whereby such ... impugned
order does not appear to be one which calls for any interference by this Court.
12. Petition accordingly stands dismissed.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant