against whom he wishes to litigate. The petitioners
are liable for tortious interference or tort of inducement of
breach of contract. The petitioners are also
whom he wishes to litigate. The petitioners are liable for tortious
interference or tort of inducement of breach of contract. The
petitioners are also liable
action founded upon
torts such as inducement, misappropriation of trade secrets, unlawful
interference and conspiracy, whereas, according to the petitioners, no such
foundational averments ... that privity of contract is not a sine qua non for fastening
tortious liability has also been assailed as legally misconceived and
beyond the scope
In Re: “City Hounded By Strays, Kids Pay ... vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh on
disposal was passed by a Magistrate would not
in any way interfere with or wipe away the right of the owner to
demand the return ... contention that the
State Government is not liable for any tortious act of its servants can
possibly arise."
In the facts of the present
standards to compute loss unlike in the case of damages.
Hence, any interference by the Appellate Courts should
ordinarily be allowed only when the compensation ... contemporaneous position of an individual which is
essentially forward-looking. Unlike tortious liability, which is
chiefly concerned with making up for the past and reinstating
standards to compute loss unlike in the
case of damages. Hence, any interference by the Appellate
Courts should ordinarily be allowed only when the
compensation ... contemporaneous position of an individual which is
essentially forward-looking.[8*] Unlike tortious liability, which
is chiefly concerned with making up for the past
Pranay Sethi , (2017) 16
SCC 680, does not require any interference. In
K.Ramya v. National Insurance Co. Ltd. , 2022
SCC OnLine SC 1338, after ... contemporaneous
position of an individual which is essentially
forward-looking. Unlike tortious liability, which
is chiefly concerned with making up for the past
and reinstating
Pranay Sethi , (2017) 16
SCC 680, does not require any interference. In
K.Ramya v. National Insurance Co. Ltd. , 2022
SCC OnLine SC 1338, after ... contemporaneous
position of an individual which is essentially
forward-looking. Unlike tortious liability, which
is chiefly concerned with making up for the past
and reinstating
Vehicle Act , but the
concept of loss of stillborn child due to tortious Act can be
borrowed in case of loss of stillborn child ... awarded by the Tribunal at `50,000/-
and `10,000/- respectively, warrants interference by this
Court."
21. While referring to Modi's Medical
