this Court held that in cases where there is denial of
tortious liability the writ petitions cannot be maintained. However, when
negligence ... questions of fact arises and if there is
clear denial of tortious liability remedy under Article 226 of the Constitution
may not be proper. However
this Court held that in cases where there is denial of tortious liability the writ petitions cannot be maintained. However, when negligence ... questions of fact arises and if there is clear denial of tortious liability remedy under Article 226 of the Constitution may not be proper. However
this Court held that in cases where there is denial of tortious liability writ petitions cannot be maintained. However, when negligence per se is visible ... questions of fact arises and if there is clear denial of tortious liability remedy under Article 226 of the Constitution may not be proper. However
this Court held that in cases where there is denial of
tortious liability the writ petitions cannot be maintained. However, when
negligence ... questions of fact arises and if there is
clear denial of tortious liability remedy under Article 226 of the Constitution
may not be proper. However
that the claim made by the Board was with regard to tortious liability and therefore, the proper remedy for the Board would be to move
company.
11. Needless to say that the principles of law governing tortious liability is principles of preponderance of probability. Testing the correctness of the finding
rate, imposition of compensation for an act of pollution, being a tortious
liability could not have been done by the 2nd respondent.
8. The Senior
proof of evidence is not required, in cases arising out of tortious liability. Therefore, the contention of the opposition parties/appellants that no First Information ... ground to reject the claim, where there is a tortious act. On the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is of the view
S.Vijayashankar vs The State Of Tamil Nadu on 4 September, 2019
Equivalent citations: AIRONLINE
well settled now that the State is
responsible for the tortious acts of its employees. Respondent 2, Delhi
Administration is liable for payment of compensation ... liability of the State for the torts committed by its
employees, it is now the settled law that the State is liable for tortious acts
