Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

K.Pandurangan vs C.Parimala .... 1St on 23 December, 2021 Author: N.Seshasayee Bench: N

mere act of negligence simpliciter leading to a tortious liability in personam with a back up right in contract of insurance. Every time someone dies

learned counsel for the appellant submitted: a) for any tortious liability that arises out of the use of a motor vehicle in a public place

granted its space. It stands to reason since compensation law for tortious liability should be established on a balancing plane of pragmatism

granted its space. It stands to reason since compensation law for tortious liability should be established on a balancing plane of pragmatism

damage to the body of the vehicle and therefore, seeking apportionment of liability equally on both the owner and their respective insurers ... includes ones failure to share the road space evenly. Tortious liability founded on negligence cannot be static. Here the contribution by the vehicle that

damage to the body of the vehicle and therefore, seeking apportionment of liability equally on both the owner and their respective insurers ... includes ones failure to share the road space evenly. Tortious liability founded on negligence cannot be static. Here the contribution by the vehicle that

damage to the body of the vehicle and therefore, seeking apportionment of liability equally on both the owner and their respective insurers ... includes ones failure to share the road space evenly. Tortious liability founded on negligence cannot be static. Here the contribution by the vehicle that

actual damages he had suffered. However, wrongful restrain also amounts to tortious liability, which may visit with unliquidated damages. While the plaintiff claim right