going into the merits of any
argument of larger public interest touted by the Appellant in the records and the
arguments of the Appellant
going into the
merits of any argument of larger public interest touted by the Appellant in the
records and the arguments of the Appellant
going into the merits
of any argument of larger public interest touted by the Appellant in the records
and the arguments of the Appellant
case of investigation/apprehension of offenders or prosecution that is
touted to be a reason for denying the information under the garb of Section
going into the
merits of any argument of larger public interest touted by the Appellant in the
records and the arguments of the Appellant
going into the merits
of any argument of larger public interest touted by the Appellant in the records
and the arguments of the Appellant
apprehension and prosecution of the offenders, even if the
investigation part is touted to be complete. Similarly, no relief is pertinent on
points
apprehension and prosecution of the offenders, even if the investigation part is
touted to be complete. Similarly, the names and identity of the
officers/appraisers
Appellant on 18.02.2022 and the final authority in the said
matter is touted to be the State Government, while the Appellant alleges that the
State