gullible website owners. Apart from these websites, the gurukkals /
archakars have setup touts inside the temple and they provide details of packages
for conduct ... temple donations but rather
they have been made by these touts of the gurukkals / archakars to collect money
from the devotees. They charge exorbitant amount
23410
and 23671 of 2022
archakars have setup touts inside the temple and they provide details of packages
for conduct of sashti aptha purthi, Ukra ... temple donations but rather
they have been made by these touts of the gurukkals / archakars to collect money
from the devotees. They charge exorbitant amount
23410
and 23671 of 2022
archakars have setup touts inside the temple and they provide details of packages
for conduct of sashti aptha purthi, Ukra ... temple donations but rather
they have been made by these touts of the gurukkals / archakars to collect money
from the devotees. They charge exorbitant amount
XVIII of 1879, against the petitioner who was alleged to be a tout.
3. The petitioner complained that the petition filed by the respondent ... against him were true, he would not be a "tout "as the word is defined in the Act, and he applied
unclaimed
and unaccounted cash of Rs.85,680/- from the office premises, touts and from
the office staff. On the above allegations, two separate proceedings ... office; (ii)
An unaccounted cash of Rs.46,910/- from private persons / Touts namely
Thiruvalargal 1. I.S. Ravichandran - Rs.1250/-, 2. V.Janardhanan
applicant or to any authorised person, who is not a tout to receive the driving licence subject to the production of authorisation letter with Court ... true that the Government has got the power to prevent touts from appearing on behalf of the owner on the ground that they cause nuisance
order passed by the learned District Judge, Nagapattinam, declaring the petitioner as tout, and further refused to register him as clerk.
2. Petitioner was working ... Nagapattinam, passed a unanimous resolution for declaring the petitioner to be a tout, on the ground that the petitioner is practising toutism
ground that she had allowed one Mr.Sridhar, a tout, inside the office to make entries in the goods register, permit register ... Assistants, they were actually written by the said tout Mr.Sridhar and D1 and D2 Assistants had simply lent their initials in the registers
illegal gratification ranging from Rs.10 to Rs.4,300/- through the touts namely Thiru Shiyam @ Subbiah @ Samuel Subbiah, Tr.Jeyaseelan, Thiru P.Selvaraj ... writ petition, is that on 08.02.2007, the petitioner allowed four touts namely, 1) Tr.R.Ramadoss, 2) Tr.Mohin Abubakkar, 3) Tr.G.Raja
from advertising or soliciting work directly or indirectly
whether by circulars, advertisements, touts, personal communication,
interviews not warranted by personal relations, furnishing or inspiring
newspaper ... connecting
them with the lawyers. This is clearly an action of “tout” as mentioned in
Rule 36.
43. Section 35 of the Advocates
