towers
erected by plaintiff were unaffected.
It was also observed by defendants that some
tower parts ('A' type tower) of the collapsed tower ... towers properly and
correct setting of towers as per the agreement.
Since plaintiff has failed to carry the work properly,
the second tower was collapsed
developing said project was duly executed on 15.04.2009 amongst
C & C Towers Ltd.; GMADA; State Government of Punjab, through
the State Transport Department ... early morning of
6/7.09.2011, some constructed portion of Tower-C collapsed, due
to no fault of the opposite parties and the same
material as a result, two of the building/towers of one of the other builders collapsed on 17.07.2018 and 9 people lost their lives ... apprehension of the District Magistrate in the light of collapse of two towers earlier is baseless. The petitioner alone has been singled out in passing
main allegation against the petitioner is that the
electrical tower erected by him was collapsed way back in
2017. Therefore, the field report
internal E/F and construction of 10 towers on the third
floor (over 20 shops) at the site in question. The construction site was
inspected ... lacking in quality as a result of which the building had collapsed and
therefore, rightly the action was taken. The petitioner is reading between
land, the said Ratanbai Building, which is on the adjoining plot,
may collapse thereby causing loss to life and property.
2. All the parties ... that the petitioners can continue with their work of
construction of the tower after a period of two weeks, since in the meantime the
MHADA
Director General (Road Development) ... vs Aam Aadmi Lokmanch . on 14 July, 2020
Equivalent citations: AIR
Jmc Projects India Ltd vs Indure Private Limited on 20 August, 2020
Equivalent citations: AIRONLINE
Abdul Latheef C.K vs State Of Kerala on 9 June, 2020
Author: S. Manikumar
Essel Propack Limited, Mumbai vs Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax ... on 27 May, 2020
IN
