Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

revenue and page No. 28 is the copy of the track consignment showing booking of letter on 20.03.2017 and it is delivered to the Assessee

sent and served upon the Appellant, as it clearly appears from track consignment (consignment no. ED947 674217IN) downloaded on 10-06-2022, however the Appellant

2017, the assessee has produced the online postal track consignment which reproduced as under: It is found from the above that the assessment order ... DCIT dispatched only on 02/01/2017 as per the postal track consignment produced at Page No. 34 of the Paper Book. Thus, keeping

counsel of the assessee has submitted that track consignment report as per the Postal Department and according to the said track consignment, the deliver

instead of ED481673181IN, falling short of one numerical. Further, from the track consignment and screenshot of the speed post web portal, the assessee demonstrated before

order passed by the Ld. A.O. Copy of post office track consignment attached for your kind reference. Accordingly, the principles of natural justice were

addressee on 02.04.2018 at 19:47:00 hours as per the track consignment report. Hence, the appellant's argument Page | 4 regarding non service

which the Ld. AR submitted that the track consignment report from the Indian Portal Website. 6. The Ld. DR submitted that as mentioned ... perused the material available on record. After going through the track report of the consignment number of the speed post, it is found that

Registry has placed on record the track consignment report downloaded from the site of Indian Post which showed that the notice was returned unclaimed

hearing by RPAD. None has appeared for the assessee while track consignment report is on his record. No more opportunity is justifiable. Arguments on merits