Search Results Page

Search Results

31 - 40 of 433 (0.64 seconds)

Acme vs Torrent on 11 January, 2010

present respondent was allowed and the appellant was restrained from using his trademark AROXIL in respect of the drug CEFADROXIL . The trademark of the respondent ... Section 9 . Thus, the appellant cannot be restrained from using the trademark in question. In support of his submissions, Mr. Tolia relied on the following
Gujarat High Court Cites 25 - Cited by 0 - K A Puj - Full Document

Parth vs Rfcl on 10 February, 2011

assignment and in respect of which the applications were pending before the Trademark Registry for registration in favour of PPPL-appellant No.1. Later ... PPPL-appellant No.1. 5.7 On 14th January 2009, the Registrar of Trademarks recorded respondent No.1 as subsequent proprietor of assigned trademarks
Gujarat High Court Cites 24 - Cited by 0 - A S Dave - Full Document

Piruz Khambatta Thro Poa Zubin ... vs Deputy Registrar Of Trademarks on 4 December, 2023

Piruz Khambatta Thro Poa Zubin ... vs Deputy Registrar Of Trademarks on 4 December, 2023 NEUTRAL CITATION C/CIA/18/2023 ORDER DATED: 04/12/2023 ... PIRUZ KHAMBATTA THRO POA ZUBIN KHAMBHATTA Versus DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF TRADEMARKS ========================================================== Appearance: MR DEVANG NANAVATI, SENIOR ADVOCATE with MR JATIN Y TRIVEDI
Gujarat High Court Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
Previous   1 2 3 4   5 6 7 8 9 10 Next