Sunil Vasudev Chelani vs Registrar Of Trademarks on 16 January, 2023
Author: Biren Vaishnav
Bench: Biren Vaishnav
C/SCA/219/2022 ORDER DATED ... CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 219 of 2022
==========================================================
SUNIL VASUDEV CHELANI
Versus
REGISTRAR OF TRADEMARKS
==========================================================
Appearance:
ARPIT R SINGHVI(9524) for the Petitioner
under:
"1. Saraf Real agrees that it shall use its Registered
Trademark (as reproduced under Recital D or with
other/different art work, however ... similar or
deceptively similar to Shree Prefab's Trademark) for its
business purposes, only with the territorial limits of
Eastern India and not beyond
2000 CAV JUDGMENT
xxx xxx xxx xxx
14 Mc. Carthy on Trademarks and Unfair
Competition [Third Edn. Vol.2], states :
"The names ... trade mark to indicate origin.
The terms "generic" and "trademark" are mutually
exclusive.... The concept of "generic name
under consideration, the same was due to
litigation for the brand name/trademark, however, the
business was not discontinued. In the meantime, the
assessee
Sonani Industries Pvt Ltd vs Prime Diamond Tech on 8 April, 2024
Author: Biren Vaishnav
2021 ]
(iv) Pharmacyclics, LLC vs. Controller General
of Patents, Design, Trademarks and
Geographical Indications[OA/46/2020/PT/DEL]
(Intellectual Property Appellate Board
decision of the Supreme Court in Whirlpool
Corporation v. Registrar of Trademarks,
Mumbai [(1998) 8 SCC 1], in particular
observation in paragraph 15, which held
decision of the Supreme Court in Whirlpool
Corporation v. Registrar of Trademarks,
Mumbai [(1998) 8 SCC 1], in particular
observation in paragraph 15, which held
asset' shall mean an intangible asset, being
know-how, patents, copyrights, trademarks,
licences, franchises or any other business or
commercial rights of similar nature
TAXAP/547/2017 ORDER
the payment of royalty for use of trademark
enabled the assessee to market the product more
easily. It was thus
