Kannada there is no difference in the
spelling of the trademark of the appellant and that of the
respondent.
15. We have referred ... provisions of Section 11 of the Act to mean that once a
trademark has acquired a distinctive character, then the
registration of the trade mark
delay and acquiescence and the stand taken by the plaintiff
before the Trademark Registry? OPD
(III) Relief."
and the suit listed for final hearing ... respect of insecticides, weedicides, herbicides, fungicides and
preparations for destroying vermin, the Trademark Registry raised
objection by issuing examination report wherein the plaintiff‟s mark
judis.nic.in
2
infringement of the plaintiff's registered trademarks Nos. 315049 and
315050, both in Class 07;
b) For a permanent injunction ... directly or
indirectly dealing in any product or service under the trademark TEXMO or
any other similar marks amounting to passing off of the products
disposal.
2. Plaintiffs filed suit for permanent injunction for passing off the
trademark DISPOSAFE saying the plaintiff is in business since the year
2013, though ... extensively sold its product under the trade name and trademark
DISPOSAFE and has a turnover of more than `14.00 Crores.
3. Admittedly, its trademark DISPOSAFE
Original Side Rules and Sections 11 , 29 , 134 and 135 of the Trademarks Act, 1999 praying to
a) a perpetual injunction restraining the defendant ... Muscleman Device and / or MRF Dealer Board by using the said trademarks or any other mark, identical with and/or deceptively similar
Goteborg
Sweden
represented by Constituted Attorney
Mr.Laxminarayan Hegde
2.Volvo Trademark Holking AB,
C/O AB Volvo
SE-405 08 Goteborg
Sweden
Represented ... High Courts Act, 2015 and Sections 11 , 27 , 29 , 134 , 135 Trademarks Act, 1999, seeking a permanent injunction restraining the defendant, their directors, proprietors, subsidiaries
others acting for and
on their behalf from using the trademark, trade name and trading style
http://www.judis.nic.in
2
featuring the mark ... Plaintiff's mark “FOODPRO”, amounting to infringement of
Plaintiff's trademark “FOODPRO” under Registration No.1872192 in class 41
respectively that amounts
Madras High Court and Sections 11 , 29 and 134 of Trademarks Act, 1999 seeking permanent injunction restraining the defendants their directors employees officers servants agents ... others acting for and on their behalf from using the trademark trade name and trading style featuring the mark FOODPRO or any other name/mark
similar mark amounting to an infringement of the Plaintiff's registered trademarks Nos.315049 and 315050, both in Class 07; seeking for a permanent ... directly or indirectly dealing in any product or service under the trademark TESMO or any other similar marks amounting to passing off of the products
Bench to decide on the issue, whether the Court can declare a Trademark as a well-known Trademark or whether the Court can only determine ... factors present to declare a Trademark as a well-known Trademark and thereafter it is the prerogative of the Registrar of Trademark to actually declare
