Cosmetics has filed
the instant suit for permanent injunction, infringement of registered
trademark, and copyright, and action for passing off with reliefs for
delivering ... Chopra, narrowed down the scope of his submissions to rights in the
trademark used by the plaintiff, which is "BLUE VALLEY". Mr Sachin
Defendant No. 1 of its rights to do business under its
Trademark "INDIAN HERITAGE SELECT". It is submitted
that the Plaintiff ... application before the United States
Trademark and Patents Office, United States of America, has
made a categorical statement and disclaimed as follows:
"No claim
duly authorized to take all
actions to protect the various trademarks of Plaintiff No. 1. The letter
dated 07.08.2006 issued by Plaintiff ... Plaintiffs are world renowned
manufacturers and sellers of beverages under the trademarks PEPSI,
MIRINDA, 7UP and MOUNTAIN DEW, among others and are also
the largest
InterMESH Limited (Defendant No.2) from infringing the
Plaintiff's registered trademark 'REAL' and from using 'REAL' or any other ... Plaintiff is packaged juice
which was launched in 1994 under the trademark 'REAL'. It is submitted
that the juices are prepared from natural
3404/2013 (of plaintiff u/S 124 of Trademarks Act, 1999)
1. The plaintiff in this suit for permanent injunction to restrain the
defendants from ... infringing the trademark TOPSIN of the plaintiff and passing
off their goods as that of the plaintiff seeks stay under Section
Plaintiffs have filed the present suit for permanent injunction,
restraining infringement of trademarks and copyrights, passing off,
dilution, damages, rendition of accounts of profits ... master licensee in respect of
the Plaintiff No.1‟s copyrights and trademarks for promotion,
publishing and merchandising purposes in the territory of India
(hereinafter
16926/2013 in CS(OS) 1572/2013 Page 1 of 75
trademarks of the Plaintiff which are being infringed by the
Defendant and of which ... Plaintiff has filed
the present suit in respect of only five trademarks of the
Plaintiff which are being infringed by the Defendant. It is
contended
other food preparation or on any other business the impugned trademark/name which is in any manner deceptively or phonetically confusingly similar to the Applicant ... respect to the Trade Mark, the applicants applied for the registration of trademark on 04.05.2000 in Class 20. The Registrar of Trade Marks, on consideration
identical business of offering
discount coupons. The defendants hold a valid trademark registration in
India for the mark GROUPON in class 35 - which pertains ... case of the plaintiff is that on 10.03.2009, the plaintiff filed a
trademark application for the mark GROUPON in USA which was granted
relief. An order was passed restraining the appellant/defendant from using
the trademark „NEO‟ or any other mark similar to the respondent/plaintiff‟s
trademark ... impugned order that the
respondent/plaintiff being the registered Proprietor of the trademark (device)
NEO under class 29 from 09.10.2007 has an exclusive right
