2019 ORDER DATED: 23/12/2022
off in respect of the trademark of the plaintiff by the
defendants. It is the case of the plaintiff ... that
plaintiff's trademark JIVRAJ-9 more particularly
numbering 9 of the plaintiff has acquired distinct and
high reputation and goodwill and the plaintiff
country. The plaintiff has also stated
regarding the facts of various trademarks, which he has
applied for Registry and details of that applications are
incorporated ... further case of the plaintiff that the plaintiff has been
using the trademark 'MICHI'S' with the device of a boy
since
advertisement expenses which
establishes goodwill and reputation of the plaintiffs. That
the trademark/ label/package "WAGH BAKRI" along with
Page ... plaintiffs and none else.
3.3. The plaintiffs have also referred to various trademarks
and also copyrighted and labels and has stated that the
labels
2019 CAV JUDGMENT DATED: 22/12/2022
trademark SHEETAL. That thereafter in the year 2000, the
plaintiff adopted and started two other brands/ trademarks
RAJSHREE ... According to
the plaintiff, he is the true owner of the said Trademark
SHEETAL, MAYUR and RAJSHREE and is using the same
continuously, exclusively
business of manufacturing, marketing and
selling varieties of ceramic items under the Trademark and
Trade name "Simero" since 2014 continuously, extensively,
exclusively, openly ... country
as well as abroad.
2.1 That the plaintiff applied for trademark registration of its
trade name "Simero" along with other application
manufacturing, marketing
and selling electronic weighing scales and systems
under the trademark AXPERT since 1.6.2000. That in
the year 2000, one of its partner ... said mark, permitted the firm to use
and utilise the said trademark for the benefit and
betterment of the respetive concern. That,
Harshadbhai deemed
Miraj Business Development Pvt. Ltd. ... vs Assistant Registrar Of Trademarks on 17 October, 2022
C/CIA/41/2022 ORDER DATED: 17/10/2022 ... FORMALLY KNOWN AS
MIRAJ PRODUCTS PVT. LTD.)
Versus
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF TRADEMARKS
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR VISHAL P GORI(10350) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1
SUDHANSHU
plaintiff no.1 and
plaintiff no.2 is exclusive owner of the Trademark "SCARY
HOUSE" under the Trade Marks Act, 1999 and also ... infringement of copyright.
According to the plaintiffs, they have adopted distinctive
trademarks, SCARY HOUSE and HORROR HOUSE and HOUSE
OF HORROR and are using
learned advocate for the petitioners
that application Ex. 6 of the Trademark Suit No. 6 of 2020
("Local Commissioner Application") inter alia under ... passed by the learned Additional District Judge,
Surat below Exhibit 6 in Trademark Suit No. 6 of 2020 and
allied matters.
6. From the other
dispute mark I-omega and
have already changed its trademark since then, in
due compliance of the order so passed by the
Page ... submits that they do
not have any interest in the disputed trademark
and do not wish to use the said trademark in future
also since
