Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 884 (2.26 seconds)

State vs . Sandeep Chauhan on 5 May, 2009

which were bearing trademark "Tarek". It is the case of prosecution that the trademark was deceptively similar to the trademark of the complainant ... goods bearing false trademark, the accused Sandeep Chauhan is liable to be charged for the offence u/s.104 of Trademark Act, 1999. 16. Contention
Delhi District Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . Naveen Kumar on 9 June, 2009

falsify any genuine trademark by alteration, addition, defacement etc., it shall be falsifying trademark. Subsection (2) of section 102 of Trademark Act, 1999 provides that ... above said articles with identical trademark/deceptively similar trademark, section 103 & 104 of the Trademark Act, 1999, gets attracted. There is a registered trademark
Delhi District Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next