High Court of Delhi in the case of TRAI vs. Yashpal
and sought to refer to his submissions dated 16.04.2014.
v) The applicant has discussed ... TRAI are well defined in Section 11 of the TRAI Act 1997. They have
pointed out that while the manpower of the TRAI is limited
notice to telecom cos
unlikely to affect consumers' and 'TRAI says cancel 69 licenses, DoT agrees to only ... were recommended to be cancelled by TRAI
mentioning separately 31 cases recommended by TRAI for outright cancellation, and 31
cases recommended by TRAI for seriously
notice to telecom cos
unlikely to affect consumers' and 'TRAI says cancel 69 licences, DoT agrees to only ... were recommended to be cancelled by TRAI
mentioning separately 31 cases recommended by TRAI for outright cancellation, and 31
cases recommended by TRAI for seriously
obtain an acknowledgement
thereof
g Action as per provisions of TRAI Act in case MSOs are alluring
LCOs to provide signal without entering into written ... Authority before the Competent Court.
However, no such cases have been filed by TRAI till date.
Page 3
m) The applicant Shri Kshitij Dutta
used by accused
persons for committing offence, in criminal Complaint case No.2116/11, for the offence u/s 497 of
IPC, pending ... disclosure.
Page 1 of 2
Decision notice:
While deciding the case of TRAI vs. Yashpal [W.P.(C) 2794/2012] wherein a father
copies of the Delhi High Court decision dated
20.11.2018 in the case of TRAI vs. Kabir Shankar Bose and the Supreme Court's
celebrated ... information from a private body (Vodafone) by a
government authority (TRAI). However, in the case at hand, the information has
been sought from
expense of TRAI.
3. Were all such tours at expense of TRAI approved by the respective/competent authorities?
4. Complete information on cases at TRAI ... agency, on tours
undertaken at the expenses of TRAI.
6. Action taken on objections, if such cases were brought to the notice of administrative Union
respondent, then the said respondent approached the TRAI for the said purpose.
Though, it is the case of the petitioner that the information sought
respondent, then the said respondent
approached the TRAI for the said purpose. Though, it is the case of the
petitioner that the information sought
dated 11/08/2016 in Case No. CIC/BS/C/2014/000103/11052 (N.
Syamasundaran Vs. TRAI, New Delhi )wherein it is held that ... would cease to be an
information accessible under the RTI Act . This case does not meet the requirement of
section
