post of Head Clerk/ Head
Assistant. The respondent then filed a contempt petition
alleging that the direction of the High Court has not been
carried ... that
petition stood transferred to the State Administrative
Tribunal on constitution of the Tribunal and was registered
as Transfer Application No. 741 of 1986. Shri
previous occasion by the son
of the second respondent for transfer of case
to some other Bench. The circumstances
narrated above would show that ... before the Bench on several
occasions without protest. The request made
for transfer, after the rejection of the
earlier petition by the learned Chief Justice
filed a Writ Petition in the High Court which Writ Petition was transferred to the Administrative Tribunal in the year 1984. The Tribunal ... absence of promotional avenues in the Department to which the Appellant was transferred. Before the said Tribunal, a counter affidavit was filed by the State
Having resorted to extra constitutional methods for
quashing of order of transfer, the Courts have no room for
.
litigants like the petitioner ... recommendations made
by any of the Employees' Unions for non-consensual transfer of
the employees of the Corporation and, in case, any of these
petitioners. The petitioners, therefore, file an
application i.e. I.A. No.10081/2018 for initiating
contempt proceeding against respondents No.2 and 3.
Thus ... Department to apply
for transfer/absorption from one local body to another
irrespective of their initial place of appointment. The
transfer from one local body
before the Tribunal shall stand transferred back to the same Civil Court from which it was transferred and in case such Court ... before the said Tribunal shall stand transferred to the High Court.
(4) Every proceeding relating to contempt, execution or review of final order or interim
been guilty of contempt in working the quarries. The High Court found all the parties to be in contempt: and on receiving an apology ordered ... appealed to the Privy Council from the order made on the contempt application. In October, 1938, the appeal was allowed, the Board holding that
copy of an application sent to President of All India Congress Committee. Paragraph 5 of this application contained the following allegations :
'On the appointment ... Bahraich not to transfer cases to the Court of the Judicial Officer and necessarily to influence him (if the cases are transferred) to decide those
this Court. The proposal to raise a multi level parking or
transferring the land in the name of the Transport Department has been
done only ... passed by this Court,
he cannot be prosecuted or punished under the Contempt of Courts Act .
Surprisingly, even till the year 2009 when the petitioner
then in the
year 1994, on the application of Kartar Singh, there was no question to
transfer R.No.9336 in the name ... considered. Respondents are liable for
contempt of Court. Notice to the respondents be issued for contempt of
Court. No evidence was led by the respondents
