Pawan Kothari vs Border Security Force on 24 March, 2026
this shall not be treated as contempt of Honb. Commission."
2. The DG (HQ) transferred the RTI Application under Section
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 644 (1.22 seconds)Asha vs Ministry Of Urban Development on 28 May, 2019
subject matter related to removal of
jhuggis and therefore the RTI application was transferred to the concerned public authority i.e.
DDA / Director Local Bodies ... since the matter was related to removal of jhuggis, the RTI application was
transferred to the concerned Public Authorities viz. Delhi Development Authority, Director
Local
Ehtesham Qutubuddin Siddiqui vs Department Of Justice on 24 June, 2019
Justice, Ministry of Law and Justice vide letter dated
28.03.2017 transferred his RTI application under Section 6(3) of the RTI Act to the
CPIO ... application. Further, the CPIO (D-II), Dept. of Justice
to whom his RTI application was transferred has also not provided any
reply/information in respect
Mr. S C Sharma vs Mcd, Gnct Delhi on 21 October, 2010
information.
(b) No advance copy of the contempt petition has been received in Law Department. However, Misc. Application
was received on 2/312P06 ... with
Shahadara(S) Zone MCD for which the same has already been transferred to the PIO/Shahdara(S) Zone
through DC/Shahdara(S) Zone
Mr.Sunil Kumar Mehra vs Mcd, Gnct Delhi on 4 October, 2010
Court, the U/S was posted/transferred out of
cadre. Name of the responsible officer for the Contempt of
Court alongwith their designations ... orders) of the High Court as stated in this RTI
application tantamount to the contempt of Court.
19. What shall be the relief
Anirudh Dhanda vs State Bank Of India on 25 October, 2022
Chandigarh Circle
only, still the respondent without application of mind had transferred the instant
RTI application to 21 Departments.
6. The respondent submitted that vide ... record of the same remains available with them and accordingly the application
was transferred to all AO (s) by the then CPIO for direct disposal
Gopal vs Delhi Police on 5 April, 2021
Information Commissioner : Shri Y. K. Sinha
Relevant facts emerging from appeal:
RTI application filed on : 25.01.2020
PIO replied ... violators for contempt of Order of
Delhi High Court.
The PIO/ACP, Traffic (HQ), Delhi vide letter dated 11.02.2020 transferred the RTI
application
Mr.Shamim Equabal vs Ministry Of Social Justice And ... on 10 June, 2010
Justice
ORDER
Sh. Shamim Equabal, the Appellant, vide his application dated 2.01.2009,
addressed to the PIO, Office of the Chief Minister, U.P., while attaching ... Appellant to initiate contempt
proceedings against the said statement with the permission of Attorney
General.
Subsequently, the RTI application was transferred
Mr.R K Jain vs Department Of Legal Affairs on 21 October, 2013
instant complaint are that the Complainant had
filed an RTI application dated 07.01.2013 before the CPIO, Solicitor General of India
seeking certain information (like, date ... Practitioner Association, Bangalore seeking permission for moving
contempt petition against the Complainant.
3. Although this RTI application was filed with the Office of the Solicitor
Siddhartha Mukherjee vs Ministry Of Petroleum & Natural Gas on 26 June, 2025
dismissed. While dismissing an
application for early hearing [CM APPL. 8755/2025), filed merely five days after
another early hearing application had been dismissed ... CPIO- Ministry of Petroleum & natural gas
1. The RTI application was timely transferred to HPCL and they had
already furnished the information available with