Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 151 (4.73 seconds)

Dr.Ganesan vs State

stated that they would arrange Donor for his father's kidney transplantation and in this regard, the Defacto Complainant had to negotiate with them ... paid to the Petitioner/A3 (Doctor) for transplantation. (ii) The stand of the 3rd Respondent/Defacto Complainant is that he paid
Madras High Court Cites 60 - Cited by 0 - M Venugopal - Full Document

Dr.Ganesan vs State

stated that they would arrange Donor for his father's kidney transplantation and in this regard, the Defacto Complainant had to negotiate with them ... paid to the Petitioner/A3 (Doctor) for transplantation. (ii) The stand of the 3rd Respondent/Defacto Complainant is that he paid
Madras High Court Cites 60 - Cited by 0 - M Venugopal - Full Document

Dr. Rajinder Singh vs The State on 24 December, 2009

Section 18 , 19 & 20 of the Transplantation of Human Organ Act, 1994 against the accused persons including the present revisionists, the revisionists/petitioners have ... wife of Sushil Arya told him that they have got his kidney transplant to Sushil Arya and beg mercy for the same. She also promised
Delhi District Court Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next