Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

Nirma Limited vs Union Of India & 6 on 23 February, 2017 Author: Harsha Devani

SECOND APPEAL No.21 of 2011 ========================================= UNION OF INDIA (TRANSPOSE AS PER ORDER 5/5/10 & 2 - Appellant(s) Versus ADAM KHAMISHA BHAGAD

circumstances, the petitioners herein had no opportunity to make a prayer for transposing them in place of the original revisionists, as contemplated under Rule

Official Liquidator are concerned. In other words, the original applicant cannot transpose himself in place of the Official Liquidator who represents the Company in liquidation

dated 5th August, 2014. Since the plaintiff No.2 - Arjanbhai Kachrabhai was transposed as plaintiff No.2 on 21 st Page

GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SECOND APPEAL No. 21 of 2011 ========================================= UNION OF INDIA (TRANSPOSE AS PER ORDER 5/5/10 & 2 - Appellant(s) Versus ADAM

GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SECOND APPEAL No. 21 of 2011 ========================================= UNION OF INDIA (TRANSPOSE AS PER ORDER 5/5/10 & 2 - Appellant(s) Versus ADAM

terms of the draft. The petitioners No.2 to 4 shall be transposed as respondents No.6 to 9. Heard the learned advocate

2013 ORAL ORDER 1. Learned advocate for the applicants seeks permission to transpose applicants No.1/1 to 1/6/4 as respondent