group of Appellants, he must file hiw own
appeal or must be transposed as a Respondent.
Alternatively, he must make an arrangement to have ... other Appellants transposed as Respondents. What
Kalpesh Shah proposes, that he will argue the Appeal
regardless of what the other Appellants want and
regardless
that MRT has assumed jurisdiction, which was not
invested in it by transposing the respondent ... been pleaded in these paragraphs that the order of MRT to
transpose respondent nos.7 and 8 therein as petitioners, was
without jurisdiction particularly when
does not wish to be
represented by that advocate, he must be transposed as a defendant
or respondent.
3. The submission before the learned Single ... then
contrive to settle the suit without the knowledge of the Plaintiff
transposed. There is no substance to this at all. The Plaintiffs could
does not wish to be
represented by that advocate, he must be transposed as a defendant
or respondent.
3. The submission before the learned Single ... then
contrive to settle the suit without the knowledge of the Plaintiff
transposed. There is no substance to this at all. The Plaintiffs could
allowed to withdraw this Petition, his clients
shall be allowed to be transposed as Petitioners in view of the
identical facts and the identical prayer ... statement.
8. We accordingly permit Respondent Nos.28 and 29 to
be transposed as the Petitioners in Writ Petition No.3813 of
1996. Leave
allowed to withdraw this Petition, his clients
shall be allowed to be transposed as Petitioners in view of the
identical facts and the identical prayer ... statement.
8. We accordingly permit Respondent Nos.28 and 29 to
be transposed as the Petitioners in Writ Petition No.3813 of
1996. Leave
allowed to withdraw this Petition, his clients
shall be allowed to be transposed as Petitioners in view of the
identical facts and the identical prayer ... statement.
8. We accordingly permit Respondent Nos.28 and 29 to
be transposed as the Petitioners in Writ Petition No.3813 of
1996. Leave
Plaintiffs do not need further
permission of the Charity Commissioner for joining /
transposing parties. However, to pre-empt any technical
objection the Applicant / Plaintiff ... Court. He has submitted that the
consent of the Charity Commissioner for transposing the
Plaintiff No.1 as Defendant is not required
have settled with Respondents Nos. 1
and 10 will need to be transposed as Respondents to the Appeal.
7. The matter was before us yesterday ... Appellants Nos. 7 and 8 and Appellants Nos. 1 to 6 have
transposed can there be any form of Consent Terms between the
transposed Respondents
have settled with Respondents Nos. 1
and 10 will need to be transposed as Respondents to the Appeal.
7. The matter was before us yesterday ... Appellants Nos. 7 and 8 and Appellants Nos. 1 to 6 have
transposed can there be any form of Consent Terms between the
transposed Respondents
