Plaintiff No.2, inview of filing of Memo by
the Plaintiff. The said application was allowed on
12.06.2017 and Defendant No.1 was transposed ... 2019 to transposed herself as Defendant No.5.
The said application came to rejected on 18.02.2020.
10. Learned Counsel representing the
Transposed Plaintiff
Apex
Court, he has now been transposed as plaintiff in the present suit i.e.
Civil Suit No.41 of 1997 and as such ... instance, where one of the plaintiffs refusing to join
as a plaintiff was first made a defendant and thereafter transposed as a
plaintiff
suit is permitted to get
herself transposed as plaintiff 2 and the plaintiff is
transposed as defendant 10.
(iii) The suit by original plaintiff ... same foot as plaintiffs and if plaintiff
does not want to contest the matter then defendant can
come as plaintiff by transposing. Here in this
transposed plaintiffs did not
adopt the case of the original plaintiff. Adopting the case of the original
plaintiff did not help the transposed plaintiffs since ... initially, as defendants and then
allowed to be transposed. The reliefs sought by the transposed plaintiffs
were specific performance of the respective agreements after completion
place with consent of the plaintiffs. Neither
the consent of original plaintiffs was there nor the consent of newly
transposed plaintiffs was there in such ... Plaintiffs 2 to
8 with Plaintiff 5 being the power-of-attorney holder of all the plaintiffs.
After the suit was decreed ex parte, Plaintiff
transposed
as Plaintiff No 6. After death of transposed plaintiff No.6 (original
defendant No.6), her legal heirs ie, Plaintiff ... 1993
Addl. Issues dated 11.08.2022 :
1. Whether the defendant No.6 (transposed
plaintiff No.6) proves that Anjanamma on
14.08.2012 during the pendency
Madhava
Ranganna, since dead (rep.by LRs who
are transposed plaintiffs.
3. B.M.Rangaraju s/o late B.R.Madhava
Ranganna, aged about ... plaintiffs. The plaintiffs are entitled for 1/5th share in the
suit schedule property. It is further stated that the
plaintiffs and defendant
2003 are not binding on her. Further 2nd
plaintiff submits that the 1st plaintiff transposed
herself as defendant no.13. Originally this suit is filed ... towards 2nd plaintiff. 1st plaintiff
also forced the 2nd plaintiff to withdraw the suit and
also has given threat to the 2nd plaintiff to withdraw
were transposed as Plaintiff Nos 2 & 3. The said
transposed Plaintiff Nos 2 & 3 got amended the suit
Plaint. Further they filed ... Plaintiffs and the Defendant No 2. Inotherwords
Defendant Nos 1 & 2 are having two sons Plaintiff
Nos 1 & 3 and one daughter Plaintiff
allowed on 25.06.2003 and, accordingly, the plaintiff No. 5 and
plaintiff Nos. 9 to 11 were transposed as defendants 3 to 6 in this suit ... original
3
sole plaintiff had expired; his legal representatives came on record as plaintiff
Nos. 2 to 8 with plaintiff No. 5 being the power
