respondent
P.S.Deivaraj, seeking leave of this Court to transpose him as the Criminal
Revision Case. Also, to convert it into Criminal Appeal against ... Sessions Court. In all those cases,
the complainant must file a transpose petition
and the Registry must convert the same as
Criminal Appeals by showing
Raju (Died)
2.R.Periasamy
(second appellant is transposed
to 14th respondent vide Court
order dated 20.10.2016 made ... JUDGMENT
K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN, J.
The present appellant and the transposed 14th respondent herein, who
are defendants in O.S.No.531 of 2004, originally
respondent
P.S.Deivaraj, seeking leave of this Court to transpose him as the Criminal Revision
Case. Also, to convert it into Criminal Appeal against ... Sessions Court. In all those cases, the
complainant must file a transpose petition and
the Registry must convert the same as Criminal
Appeals by showing
Raju (Died)
2.R.Periasamy
(second appellant is transposed
to 14th respondent vide Court
order dated 20.10.2016 made ... JUDGMENT
K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN, J.
The present appellant and the transposed 14th respondent herein, who
are defendants in O.S.No.531 of 2004, originally
Nagar, IV Sector, K.K.Nagar,
Chennai 600 078.
(R2 transposed as A4 vide order of
Court dated 18.11.2024 made ... Safaa Apartments,
GST Road, Guduvanchery,
Chennai 603 202.
2.Anto Dev Prakash(Transposed as A4)
S/o late Mr.A.X.Ignatius
th
Plot
Gounder
9.Madhaiyan
10.Muniyappan .. Appellants
* Respondents 80, 83 and 88 are transposed as appellants 8 to 10 vide
Order of Court dated 23.11.2016 made ... Sali
77.Chinnathai
78.Dhanakodi
79.Andheri Gounder
80.Venkatarama Gounder
(Transposed as appellant 8 vide Order of Court dated 23.11.2016 made
death of the plaintiff, the defendants were transposed as plaintiffs 2 to 4. The claim of the plaintiffs regarding possession and title was denied ... defendants 2 to 4, the legal heirs of the first plaintiff, were transposed as plaintiffs on the death of Venkataraman. The legal representatives
Chitra Raghavan
4.Mr.Venkatesh .. Petitioners
(The respondents 1 to 3 transposed as petitioners
2,3 and 4 in the place of the deceased petitioner ... Subramanian and Chitra Raghavan, who were
the respondents 1 and 2 sought transpose them as petitioners in their
application No:5674 of 2023 leaving their
Chitra Raghavan
4.Mr.Venkatesh .. Petitioners
(The respondents 1 to 3 transposed as petitioners
2,3 and 4 in the place of the deceased petitioner ... Subramanian and Chitra Raghavan, who were
the respondents 1 and 2 sought transpose them as petitioners in their
application No:5674 of 2023 leaving their
arrayed as the third defendant. Later he
was transposed as second plaintiff. The plaintiffs claim that Rudraiah as the
Producer and Director of the Movie
