laid the trap, and arrested the accused. PW2 is the public
servant, who witnessed the pre-trap and post-trap procedures.
PW3 is the person ... trap on the basis of the Ext.P3 complaint of PW1, and PW2 is
the public servant who witnessed the trap procedure
complainant, PW2 is the
public servant who witnessed the pre-trap and post-trap
procedures including the seizure of phenolphthalein tainted
currency from the possession ... accepted bribe for
discharging his official duty.
8. The pre-trap and post-trap procedures are
well proved by the evidence
notes to
49 Spl.C.C.No.74/2005
demonstrate the trap procedure. He has explained as to if
the Phenolphthalein Powder came into contact ... evidence of PWs.1 and 2
regarding demonstration of trap procedure shown to the
53 Spl.C.C.No.74/2005
Complainant and witnesses
from complainant, he was trapped and amount was
recovered and trap procedure was followed. As accused No.1
informed that he has to give ... accused No.2, along with transfer application. Thereafter, Trap
Team entered the house and trap procedures were followed.
Hands of accused No.2 were washed
lodged a complaint. ACB
conducted the usual pre-trap procedure, applied phenolphthalein powder to five
notes of Rs.100/- denomination, and instructed the complainant ... exact handing over,
corroborated every other material circumstance, including the pre-trap procedures,
the signal, the apprehension of the appellant, the recovery of tainted currency
that,
the statements of the accused, were recorded, after completion
of trap procedure, while the accused persons were in the
custody of the police ... original CD is at MO3.
The entire pretrap procedure was thereafter, reduced into
writing, as per Ex.P.3 - Mahazar. The entire pretrap
complainant gave complaint to Lokayukta police and after
following pre-trap and trap procedures, accused was trapped
when he received the tainted notes ... same day the trap was planned and
after drawing pre-trap mahazar and following pre-trap
procedures the trap team along with complainant proceeded
towards
Complaint, verification of the Complaint
regarding illegal gratification and pre-trap procedures
9. PW-6 is the Complainant of this case. His examination-in-chief ... trap team who were also fully
satisfied with the genuineness of the Complaint. The
prosecution has also been able to prove the pre-trap procedures
witness. Subsequently, he had
narrated about the trap procedure. He has further made
admission on the leading question by the prosecutor that he has
knowledge ... witness of
preliminary stage, when the trap procedure was demonstrated to
the complainant and the witnesses in the office of ACB.
Chandrasekhar Soni
consistent evidence corroborating
that of PW1, proving all the pre-trap and post-trap
procedures, and also recovery of the tainted money from
the possession ... witnesses are consistent regarding the pre-trap and post-
trap procedures and also the recovery of the tainted money
from the possession of the accused
