incident had occurred, any minor diversions from the
settled pre-trap procedure does not vitiated the disciplinary
proceedings. | He relied upon the charge alleged against ... discrepancies
highlighted by the applicant with respect to the pre-trap and trap
procedures are also relevant and required to be considered by the
Appellate
appreciated even if such a statement is devoid of the external trappings called procedures. It appears that the s. 292B of the IT Act does ... appreciated even if such a statement is devoid of the external trappings called procedures. As per s. 292B , no proceedings are invalid, if such proceedings
remembered that these proceedings are not judicial proceedings having procedural trapping of the Evidence Act . What is essential is with compliance of principles of natural
procedure for the departmental Trap case has been clearly explained as under:
307. Departmental Trap cases - Procedure & Guidelines:
307.1 The Railway Vigilance department also ... after the trap.
307.9 A site plan should also be prepared indicating the important features of the trap, namely, where the trap was laid
customer care system. The opposite parties have entangled the Complainant into procedural trap in order to absolve the opposite parties from its negligent actions
when the cash was being tallied
with the records as per trap procedure in the presence of Sri S.A.K
Jeelani, Train conductor ... trap. Besides, Sri Jeelani, Train Conductor was
also a part of the trap proceedings. Memos prescribed were prepared as
per procedure. In fact
highlights the need to comply with a substantial part of the
trap procedure as contained in the Vigilance Manual. In the instant case,
it would ... after the trap.
307.9 A site plan should also be prepared indicating the
important features of the trap, namely, where the trap
was laid
decision in that case and held that in respect of trap cases, the procedure
has to be substantially followed. In the instant case, the alleged ... officers,
who are entrusted with the task of investigation of trap cases and
departmental trap cases against the railway officials. This Court proceeded
further contended that the departmental trap was conducted by the vigilance in violation of the Rules and Trap procedure contained in the Indian Railway Vigilance ... vigilance, which is inconsistent with Rule 307.5(iv) to lay departmental trap. Rule 307.6 of the IRVM provide that public money cannot be utilized either
respondents themselves, is necessary. Para 307 carries the heading Departmental Trap Cases Procedure & Guidelines. Accordingly, any action taken invoking provisions of this para ... provisions relevant in the instant case are reproduced belowe : -
307. Departmental Trap Cases Procedure & Guidelines:
307.1 The Railway Vigilance department also carries out decoy
