illegal trap without registering an FIR before trap.
That apart, Ext.P2 complaint given by PW1 also was obtained
just before trap as instructed ... crime and as such the contention
that this is an illegal trap would not succeed. The learned Special
Public Prosecutor read out the evidence
justice. In our view,
the respondents have totally relied upon an
illegal trap, a CD which has no evidentiary value
and proceedings which ... justice. In our view, the respondents have
totally relied upon an illegal trap, a CD which has no
evidentiary value and proceedings which
justice. In our view, the respondents
have totally relied upon an illegal trap, a CD
which has no evidentiary value and proceedings
which ... Chetan Prakash has held that
respondents have relied upon an illegal trap, i.e., a
CD which is not admissible and the proceedings
Stores on 12.08.2002, i.e., at the time of trap and demanded the said illegal gratification and as such, P.W.5 has come forward ... version that the accused made such a demand of illegal gratification at the time of trap, i.e., on 12.08.2002. It is to be reiterated
trap and on
the date of trap and as such the entire prosecution version is liable to be
rejected.
(5)The evidence of trap witness ... have been made by the accused prior
to the trap.
17. Demand of illegal gratification said to have been made by the accused
came to the conclusion that there was demand of illegal
gratification amounting to Rs.25000/- by appellant/accused
No.1 G.D.Inamdar from complainant ... Corruption Bureau as well as
Verification cum Trap Panchnama, Exhibit 11, reflects that at the
time of trap, it was at this cabin of appellant
demand
and when there is no acceptance, coupled with illegal sanction, his
conviction is absolutely illegal and he needs to be acquitted from ... witness against accused no.1 in such
false and illegal trap.
9. Minute and full details of entire case and entire evidence before the
trial
made by the accused prior to the date of trap.
(b) The alleged demand of illegal gratification made by the accused on the date ... prosecution is to the effect that the accused demanded illegal gratification prior to the trap conducted on 31.08.1994 as well as on the date
animal articles could not be treated as relevant in preventing the illegal trapping, killing and hunting of animals. The protection of large number of wild ... Schedule II. Ban on hunting and trappings of wild animals had also been imposed. Despite these measures, the illegal poaching of wild animals continued
(C.B.I. vs . Bangaru Laxman) on 27 April, 2012
In the matter of:
(C
