against
miniscule 2% market share of appellant.
14. Admittedly, the turnover of the appellant qua dry cell battery was lesser
than M/s Geep ... profits in later years. Thus in
view of the above we hereby decrease the penalty imposed upon the appellant
to 2% of the turn-over
against
miniscule 2% market share of appellant.
14. Admittedly, the turnover of the appellant qua dry cell battery was lesser
than M/s Geep ... profits in later years. Thus in
view of the above we hereby decrease the penalty imposed upon the appellant
to 2% of the turn-over
against
miniscule 2% market share of appellant.
14. Admittedly, the turnover of the appellant qua dry cell battery was lesser
than M/s Geep ... profits in later years. Thus in
view of the above we hereby decrease the penalty imposed upon the appellant
to 2% of the turn-over
against
miniscule 2% market share of appellant.
14. Admittedly, the turnover of the appellant qua dry cell battery was lesser
than M/s Geep ... profits in later years. Thus in
view of the above we hereby decrease the penalty imposed upon the appellant
to 2% of the turn-over
Canara Bank vs Mr. Ravi Kumar Jain on 7 September, 2024
IN THE COURT OF
