earlier
years has come down, which is evident from drastic decrease in
turnover. Therefore, the argument of the assessee that the
bonus is paid
earlier
years has come down, which is evident from drastic decrease in
turnover. Therefore, the argument of the assessee that the
bonus is paid
earlier
years has come down, which is evident from drastic decrease in
turnover. Therefore, the argument of the assessee that the
bonus is paid
commission expenses when in fact, the total
decrease in sales is attribution to reduction in export turnover
only whereas, the domestic sales within India
Acit., Circle-8(1), Hyderabad vs Ncc Hes Jv, Hyderabad on 11 February, 2025
आयकर
Sabir , Sew & Prasad Jv,Hyderabad vs Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax , ... on 24 February
year was Rs.5,86,96,663/, which was 1.13% of the turnover, after
considering the expenses incurred in that year for which ... implies a loss of
Rs.13,51,391/-being 0.023% of the turnover/receipts. Therefore, in the present
year the loss as a percentage
were under Malkajgiri
District.
The appellant in the impugned FY had sales turnover of Rs.
17,88,90,913/- on which he had declared ... current impugned
assessment year, the net profit was deliberately decreased for the sake
of increasing profit by claiming various bogus expenses such as higher
amount
Suryanarayana Gandla,Anantapur vs Acit., Circle - 1, Anantapur on 31 October, 2025
आयकर अपील य
Fedora Sea Foods Private Ltd,Nellore vs Acit., Circle-1, Nellore on 20 August, 2025