from page-1 of the
assessment order itself. The assessee declared total
turnover of Rs.5,69,89,515/- resulting into gross profit ... assessee explained that the
decrease was due to increase in the turnover. However, the
ld. Assessing Officer estimated the gross profit at 30%
which resulted
arises how to determine the profit element. For this purpose, the
total turnover and percentage of gross profit for the earlier 3 years was
obtained ... gross profit rate was also
decreasing every year and in the year under consideration it has decreased to
3%. It is also an established fact
will
indicate that the company has been consistently growing in
terms of turnover as well as the profit margins. The earnings
before the interest ... immediately preceding year. Further, the staff expenses have
only marginally decreased from 8.45% to 8.14% of the total
cost as compared to the earlier year
Dcit 1(3), Mumbai vs Syngenta India Ltd, Pune on 30 November, 2016
आयकर अपीलीय
Bhupendra C. Dalal, Mumbai vs Dcit (Osd Ii) Cen Rg 7, Mumbai on 9 November
Abbott India Ltd, Mumbai vs Assessee on 24 August, 2016
आयकर अपील
य अ धकरण
Asian Advertising , Mumbai vs Assessee on 23 March, 2016
आयकर अपील
य अ धकरण "
Syngenta Biosciences P.Ltd, Pune vs Assessee on 22 April, 2016
IN THE INCOME TAX
Varsha P. Shah, Mumbai vs Department Of Income Tax on 23 September, 2016
IN THE
Vivek Shyam Johri, Mumbai vs Assessee on 26 April, 2016
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE
