Dcit, New Delhi vs M/S. Asian Sky Shop Ltd., New Delhi on 30 August
Vandana Jain, Jaipur vs Acit, Jaipur on 25 May, 2017
vk;dj vihyh; vf/kdj
Dcit Cen Cir 2(3), Mumbai vs Sanjay Chemical India P. Ltd, Mumbai on 15
from Rs. 1,96,057/- to Rs. 5,75,513/-.
3. Refund decrease from Rs. 3,86,943/- to Rs.7,487/- (after
considering ... assessee had borrowed funds for its share trading activities.
He had substantial turnover in derivative segment and throughout the
year funds were used for derivative
New Tea Co. Ltd., Kolkata vs Pcit -2, Kolkata, Kolkata on 12 July, 2017
IN
Shashi Sharma, Dehradun vs Dcit, Dehradun on 3 January, 2017
N THE INCOME TAX APPELATE
The Acit, Central Circle-2(4),, ... vs M/S. Anand Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.,, ... on 20
Shree Balaji Industires , Khanna vs Income Tax Officer, Khanna on 3 January, 2017
IN THE
stated
that assessee-company is in the process of winding up and turnover was reduced from ... verified the facts and noticed that there was substantial decrease in
production apart from the fact that the company was in serious financial troubles
were not genuine to some extent and
accordingly he added 3.23% of turnover i.e., fall in gross profit as
unexplained expenditure ... explanation has been given by the appellant for explaining
the sharp decrease in the Gross Profit in this year.
As some fresh evidences were submitted