rate
was prejudicially decrease in the present year but
the turnover has increased and therefore, the same
Page 7 of 8
Downloaded
given note in its report that the turnover for the year ended on 31st March 2002 has decreased marginally by about 25%, however the same
Profit was due to increase in the
cost of raw material and decrease in sale realization. We
find that the AO did not give ... there is increase in turnover, therefore the gross
profit ought to have been increased instead of
decreasing. We are of the view that such reasoning
DPIL had projected
turnover of Rs.2197.60 Crores for the year 2012 whereas
the actual turnover was Rs.1267.60 Crores only ... achieved a turnover of
Rs.1740.38 Crores as on 31.03.2012, which was less by
Rs.457.22 Crores from the projected turnover figure
DPIL had projected
turnover of Rs.2197.60 Crores for the year 2012 whereas
the actual turnover was Rs.1267.60 Crores only ... achieved a turnover of
Rs.1740.38 Crores as on 31.03.2012, which was less by
Rs.457.22 Crores from the projected turnover figure
decrease in the prices of scrap and poor market
conditions, there was steep reduction in the business
of sales of scrap which affected the turnover
Union Of India And Ors. vs Ambalal Sarabhai Enterprises Ltd. on 30 July, 1983
Equivalent
Commissioner Of Income Tax Tax-Iii vs M/S. Priyanka Gems....Opponent(S) on 12
Harsh Dipak Shah vs Union Of India on 4 January, 2022
Author: J. B. Pardiwala
The Principal Commissioner Of Income ... vs Gujarat Fluorochemicals Ltd. on 18 February, 2020
Author: J
