Md. Muzafar Hossain Khan vs State Of Orissa on 7 December, 1989
justice. Petitioner is a representative of the people, elected in two consecutive terms. While not considering whether he ought to have gone to the polling
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 594 (1.53 seconds)Gaurav Shukla vs State Of U.P. & Anoather on 18 March, 2016
could be declared not juvenile in the earlier case which took place two months prior to the subsequent case. He further submits that the declaration ... board shall be eligible for appointment for a maximum period of two consecutive terms. This means that the maximum tenure of a member
Md. Safi vs The State on 8 July, 1953
exceeding two hundred rupees" and he argues that according to Section 35 (3) , Criminal P. C. where there are two consecutive terms of imprisonment ... Section 411 except to this extent that where two sentences of imprisonment are passed on two different counts in the same trial
Md. Safi vs The State on 8 July, 1953
exceeding two hundred rupees" and he argues that according to Section 35 (3) , Criminal P. C. where there are two consecutive terms of imprisonment ... Section 411 except to this extent that where two sentences of imprisonment are passed on two different counts in the same trial
Narasimha Rao vs . State, As Mentioned In That Letter. on 29 August, 2022
that A-1
was elected as an MP, Rajya Sabha for two consecutive terms from the
State of Bihar and his first term
Muthuramalingam & Ors vs State Rep.By Insp.Of Police on 19 July, 2016
directed to run consecutively.
The result was that the appellants were to undergo consecutive life
sentences ranging between two to eight such sentences depending upon ... awarding of
two or more life sentences to the prisoner. It was a case of two term
sentences being awarded for two different offences committed
Vishal Yadav vs State Govt. Of Up on 6 February, 2015
Vishal Yadav vs State Govt. Of Up on 6 February, 2015
Author: Gita Mittal
Bench
Suresh Chand vs Ajit Singh Dahiya And Ors on 17 December, 2021
murders allegedly
committed by them would run consecutively and not
concurrently. It was argued that in terms of Section 31 of the
Criminal Procedure Code ... whether the Court could order life sentence
and term sentence to run consecutively?" was considered. It was observed
29 of 69
::: Downloaded
Girish Gautam S/O Malaram Sharma ... vs State Of Gujarat on 4 April, 2018
additional obligation to direct whether the sentences
awarded would run concurrently or consecutively. This aspect of
criminal jurisprudence has been statutorily recognized in Indian
Criminal ... Indian Penal Code.
In terms of Section 31(2) of the Code wherever the Court
awards consecutive sentences, it shall not be necessary
Muthuramalingam vs State Rep.By Insp.Of Police on 19 July, 2016
directed to run consecutively. The result was that the appellants were to
undergo consecutive life sentences ranging between two to eight such sentences
depending upon ... awarding of two or
more life sentences to the prisoner. It was a case of two term sentences being
awarded for two different offences committed