notice and Annexure-7
order clearly admit that the suo motu
proceedings under section 37 of Kerala
General Sales Tax Act was initiated based ... reassessment proceedings? Is this not bad
for initiation of two parallel proceedings by
the department on the same issue?
V. Can the exemption claimed
notice and Annexure-7
order clearly admit that the suo motu
proceedings under section 37 of Kerala
General Sales Tax Act was initiated based ... reassessment proceedings? Is this not bad
for initiation of two parallel proceedings by
the department on the same issue?
V. Can the exemption claimed
confiscation' and 'prosecution' do
not belong to two parallel streams and that there is only one
authority ie. the 'Court ... orders to be passed by the Court in the
prosecution proceedings, that the vehicle can be confiscated as
clearly provided in Sub Section
confiscation' and 'prosecution' do not belong to
two parallel streams and that there is only one authority ie. the
'Court ... orders to be passed by the Court in the prosecution
proceedings, that the vehicle can be confiscated as clearly
provided in Sub Section
confiscation' and 'prosecution' do not belong to
two parallel streams and that there is only one authority ie. the
'Court ... orders to be passed by the Court in the prosecution
proceedings, that the vehicle can be confiscated as clearly
provided in Sub Section
confiscation' and 'prosecution' do not belong to two parallel streams
and that there is only one authority ie. the 'Court ... orders to be passed by the Court
in the prosecution proceedings, that the vehicle can be confiscated as
clearly provided in Sub Section
confiscation' and 'prosecution' do not belong to
two parallel streams and that there is only one authority ie. the
'Court ... orders to be passed by the Court in the prosecution
proceedings, that the vehicle can be confiscated as clearly
provided in Sub Section
confiscation' and 'prosecution' do not belong to two parallel streams
and that there is only one authority ie. the 'Court ... orders to be passed by the Court
in the prosecution proceedings, that the vehicle can be confiscated as
clearly provided in Sub Section
confiscation' and 'prosecution' do not belong to two parallel streams
and that there is only one authority ie. the 'Court ... orders to be passed by the Court
in the prosecution proceedings, that the vehicle can be confiscated as
clearly provided in Sub Section
parallel criminal
Crmc 2780/12 7
proceeding under S. 145 of the Code, would not be
justified. The parallel proceedings should not be
permitted ... property
during the pendency of the dispute, the parallel
proceedings i.e S.145 proceedings should not continue.
9. In this case, there
