felt that there is no such requirement under the law and two parallel proceedings could be maintained.
2.9 It was at this stage that ... respondent-Company cannot maintain two parallel proceedings, one before the Debt Recovery Tribunal under the Act of 1993 and another under
advocate Mr.Vishwas Shah
for the respondent No.2 submitted that two parallel
proceedings cannot be initiated together for the same debt ... Court in the case of
M/s.Gimpex Private Ltd. (supra), two parallel proceedings
cannot be continued for the same debt, therefore, the
complaints were
proceedings under Section 93 are judicial proceedings. Once, the proceedings under Section 93 of the Act are initiated and concluded, the parallel proceedings under Section ... practical purposes parallel proceedings and the judgment given earlier in one proceedings would bar the second proceedings. The Legislature that has enacted Sections
Advocate General argued the preliminary objection. He put the preliminary objection on two grounds. The first ground was that the Act and the Rules constituted ... challenging the validity of the election and there would, therefore, be two parallel proceedings, one before the Civil Judge, Junior Division, and the other before
this brings us to the issue `whether there can be two parallel proceedings'. Admittedly, there is no bar under the provisions for parallel proceedings
Code does not contain parallel provision like Section 10 of the Civil Procedure Code wherein subsequently instituted proceedings involving similar issues between the same parties ... required to be seriously considered. He submitted that if these two parallel proceedings for maintenance are allowed to go on simultaneously, a situation might arise
long period for disposal of the Civil Suits as compared to the proceedings before the Claims Tribunal. Such course will be against the very object ... dispose of the petitions summarily. That apart when there are two parallel proceedings arising from a single event, one before the Claims Tribunal
self same relief so that for the self same relief, two parallel proceedings before two forum are not taken.
Admittedly, in the said case, two
submitted that even otherwise if two parallel Courts are permitted to conduct two parallel proceedings independent of each other, there would be a possibility
this juncture. No doubt ordinarily when parallel, civil and criminal, proceedings are pending, criminal proceedings should proceed. However, which proceeding should be preferred ... This Court has already given guidelines and principles in case of two parallel proceedings, so that trial court could determine as to what approach
