correction of
typographical and other errors, but the error in the present case is not a
typographical error. It is also averred that the writ ... could correct only typographical errors and error occurred in the record
of the petitioner is not stated to be a typographical error. There
mistake committed certainly does not come within the preview of
a typographical error. The term typographical error is defined as a
mistake made ... obligation to do cannot be called as a typographical error. As a
consequence the plea of typographical error cannot be entertained
in this regard since
Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (E.O.)II Chennai for correcting the typographical error in the remand report. Learned counsel was at pains to point ... mentioning of Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (E.O.)II was a typographical error. Learned Public Prosecutor pointed out that such typographical error could not suggest
record and the same is for correction of some
inadvertent typographical errors. He further submits that the proposed
amendment does not change the nature ... mistake committed certainly does not
come within the preview of a typographical error. The
term "typographical error" is defined as a mistake made
under Section 33 of
the 1996 Act for rectification of the typographical error. The said application
was dismissed on 13.05.2024 by the learned Arbitrator being ... Securities and
Facilities", which is purely a typographical error.
13. The Coordinate Bench in Ahmad Mian v. Bhasin Infotech &
Infrastructure
occasion to consider the question of correction of computational and typographical error in the award and observed as under:
A plain reading of the aforesaid ... parties, and application for correction of any computational errors or typographical errors has to be made to the arbitral tribunal within 30 days from
letter dated 27.06.2013, clarified that mention of section 153A was a
typographical error. The AO submitted in the remand report that proper
satisfaction was recorded
letter dated 27.06.2013, clarified that mention of section 153A was a
typographical error. The AO submitted in the remand report that proper
satisfaction was recorded
letter dated 27.06.2013, clarified that mention of section 153A was a
typographical error. The AO submitted in the remand report that proper
satisfaction was recorded
letter dated 27.06.2013, clarified that mention of section 153A was a
typographical error. The AO submitted in the remand report that proper
satisfaction was recorded
