date will be
31.12.1988 (but it appears to be a typographical error and it can be
read as 31.12.1989) because vide Notification /Memo No.5518 ... they have come to the conclusion
that due to typographical error the cut-off date 31.12.1988 be read
as 31.12.1989. Therefore, there is no ambiguity
mistake committed certainly does not come within the
preview of a typographical error. The term "typographical
error" is defined as a mistake made ... obligation to
do cannot be called as a typographical error. As a consequence
the plea of typographical error cannot be entertained in this
regard since
separate sets of original stamped signed awards. As there were
some typographical errors in the award, on an application filed ... pass a
procedural order dated May 9, 2024, by correcting the typographical errors.
One single application was made for correction of the award, but such
Society,
Fateganj, Vadodara'. The appellants have stated that
it as typographical error or clerical error, which is
fabricated version. Looking to the clarification made ... Faliyu, Taluka: Valiya,
District: Bharuch' through oversight and due to
typographical error. Actually, Revaben @ Renukaben
Jibhai Vasa W/o. Kanubhai Shanabhai Gohil - the
plaintiff
petitioner submitted that true it is, that due to
inadvertence or typographical error, 'the Conduct of Election Rules,
1961' has been mentioned ... memo of petition, but the same being inadvertent
typographical error is required to be ignored. He nevertheless
submitted that the petitioner has moved an application
learned Counsel for the Petitioners/tenants that an
inadvertent typographical error had crept into the Impugned Order which
was overlooked by the learned Counsel ... Code of Civil
Procedure, 1908 for correction of the typographical error as appearing in the
Impugned Order. The Application was taken up for hearing
laws, correction in spelling errors is factual
typographical errors. But, in the correction sought by the 1 st
respondent in the name of his father ... sought by the petitioner does not fit in
the category of typographical error as there is considerable
change in the name of the father
sought by the petitioner does not fit in the
category of typographical error as there is considerable change in
the name of the parents ... sought by the petitioner does not fit in the
category of typographical error as there is considerable
change in name of the mother
writ
petitioner does not fit in the category of typographical error as there is
considerable change in the name of mother of the candidate ... respondent does not fit
in the category of typographical error as there is considerable
WA.No.441 OF 2021 -5-
change in the name
petitioner does not fit in the category of typographical error as there is
considerable change in the name of father of the candidate.
6. Assailing ... respondent does not fit
in the category of typographical error as there is considerable
change in the name of the mother of the petitioner
