letter dated 27.06.2013, clarified that mention of section 153A was a
typographical error. The AO submitted in the remand report that proper
satisfaction was recorded
letter dated 27.06.2013, clarified that mention of section 153A was a
typographical error. The AO submitted in the remand report that proper
satisfaction was recorded
letter dated 27.06.2013, clarified that mention of section 153A was a
typographical error. The AO submitted in the remand report that proper
satisfaction was recorded
letter dated 27.06.2013, clarified that mention of section 153A was a
typographical error. The AO submitted in the remand report that proper
satisfaction was recorded
letter dated 27.06.2013, clarified that mention of section 153A was a
typographical error. The AO submitted in the remand report that proper
satisfaction was recorded
letter dated 27.06.2013, clarified that mention of section 153A was a
typographical error. The AO submitted in the remand report that proper
satisfaction was recorded
letter dated 27.06.2013, clarified that mention of section 153A was a
typographical error. The AO submitted in the remand report that proper
satisfaction was recorded
assessee at the outset submitted that
there is a typographical error in the valuation report obtained from
the registered valuer. He submitted as against ... Counsel for the assessee that there
was a typographical error in the report of the valuer and it should
be read
order.
2. It is pointed out that the following typographical errors had occurred
in para 3 at page 3 of impugned order ... typographical mistakes
mentioned in sub paras a, b and c of para 6 of the petition are in the
nature of clerical / typographical errors which
Rajarshi Shahu Shikshan Sanstha Inam ... vs Ito Exemption, Kolhapur on 18 December, 2025
IN THE
