been rightly pointed out by the office that there
is a typographical error in the order dated 22.12.2022, wherein
'19.10.2023' has been typed
High Court
Rules, before an Oath Commissioner and though a
clerical/typographical error may be corrected with the
leave of the Court, in my view
Nahar
Bridge". It cannot be treated to be a mere typographical
error. Whether "Mohan Bigha" and "Nahar Bridge
appearing on
behalf of the petitioners states that there is a typographical error
in cause title of the application inasmuch as the petitioner
Code and
Section 27 of the Arms Act. There is apparent typographical error in
the prayer portion of the application, in which, 'Nawkothi ... Nawkothi P.S. Case No.
83 of 2018'. Since the typographical error is apparent, the same is
ignored.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf
SHARAN SINGH
ORAL ORDER
2 22-02-2016 There are inadvertent typographical errors in paragraph
9 of the application. Keeping in view the nature
