payment of Rs. 14,75,000/- was not in cash,
typographical error and/or the payment of Rs. 13 ,25,000/ - made through
cheque ... cash and part payment was
made through cheque, there exist a typographical error in the agreement drafted.
7
ITA No. 44/JP/2024
Smt. Rajni
assessee has submitted a reply, but there was a typographical error
in the mobile numbers in two cases. When the Inspector called the beneficiaries,
they ... assessee has submitted a reply, but there was a typographical error in the
mobile numbers in two cases. When the Inspector called the beneficiaries, they
assessee has submitted a reply, but there was a typographical error
in the mobile numbers in two cases. When the Inspector called the beneficiaries,
they ... assessee has submitted a reply, but there was a typographical error in the
mobile numbers in two cases. When the Inspector called the beneficiaries, they
assessee has submitted a reply, but there was a typographical error
in the mobile numbers in two cases. When the Inspector called the beneficiaries,
they ... assessee has submitted a reply, but there was a typographical error in the
mobile numbers in two cases. When the Inspector called the beneficiaries, they
assessee has submitted a reply, but there was a typographical error
in the mobile numbers in two cases. When the Inspector called the beneficiaries,
they ... assessee has submitted a reply, but there was a typographical error in the
mobile numbers in two cases. When the Inspector called the beneficiaries, they
typographical error in the date of pronouncement of the order which was
wrongly mentioned as 13.06.2024 which was suo moto corrected by the
Adjudicating Authority ... order dated 13.05.2024 in any manner
rather there is typographical error in the date of pronouncement which was
wrongly mentioned as 13.06.2024 which was corrected
typographical error in the date of pronouncement of the order which was
wrongly mentioned as 13.06.2024 which was suo moto corrected by the
Adjudicating Authority ... order dated 13.05.2024 in any manner
rather there is typographical error in the date of pronouncement which was
wrongly mentioned as 13.06.2024 which was corrected
typographical error in the date of pronouncement of the order which was
wrongly mentioned as 13.06.2024 which was suo moto corrected by the
Adjudicating Authority ... order dated 13.05.2024 in any manner
rather there is typographical error in the date of pronouncement which was
wrongly mentioned as 13.06.2024 which was corrected
typographical error in the date of pronouncement of the order which was
wrongly mentioned as 13.06.2024 which was suo moto corrected by the
Adjudicating Authority ... order dated 13.05.2024 in any manner
rather there is typographical error in the date of pronouncement which was
wrongly mentioned as 13.06.2024 which was corrected
states that the said address given in both these
affidavits is typographical error and the OP does not
operate from the said address ... different
affidavits filed at two different times cannot be a
typographical error or oversight. Further, once the
affidavit is signed and sworn under the oath
