Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

ORAL) Counsel for the petitioners states that there is some typographical error in the Memo of Parties as instead of State of Haryana, the State

court. To the mind of this Court, probably it is a typographical error. The spirit of the order does reflect that the lower appellate court

shown as the sons of Jatinder Singh, which is an inadvertent typographical error. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondents No.2 and 3 states

Learned counsel for respondent No.2-complainant states that due to typographical error in the statement of complainant, Section 323 IPC has been repeated twice

mentioned in the order inadvertently. Since there was a typographical error in the summoning order dated 04.04.2016, the petitioner moved an application seeking clarification

counsel for the petitioner has outrightly submitted that there is some typographical error in the head note and prayer of the petition. In fact, prayer

compromised between the parties. He further states that there is some typographical error in the statement of the complainant, wherein he has stated that

derive any benefit from this mistake as it is only a typographical error. Had the amount of Rs.4 lakh actually been borrowed

shown as Annexure P-1 and it is because of some typographical error that instead of Annexure A-1, it has been typed as Annexure

Learned counsel for the petitioners states that there is typographical error in para No.3 of the petition. The date of birth of the petitioner