written statement was filed in order to correct a
typographical error with regard to reference of a number
of the deed in the written statement ... this Court that the opposite parties sought to
4
correct a typographical error in the number of the deed
by way of amendment
written statement was filed in order to correct a
typographical error with regard to reference of a number
of the deed in the written statement ... this Court that the opposite parties sought to
4
correct a typographical error in the number of the deed
by way of amendment
learned advocate appearing for the
petitioner submits that there is a typographical error
in the order dated May 6, 2025. He submits that the
direction ... Division) at
Serampore, Hooghly.
It appears that there is a typographical error in
the cause-title of the application under Article 227 of
the Constitution
order dated 24th of March, 2025 there are
some inadvertent typographical errors in the body of the
judgment; learned counsel for the petitioners mentioned ... typographical errors. Let the typographical errors
appearing in the body of the judgment be corrected in
the following way-
In the cause title the petitioners
learned advocate appearing for the petitioner
submits that there is a typographical error in the cause
title of the civil revisional application. She prays ... leave
to correct the typographical error in the cause title of the
civil revisional application. Such leave is granted.
The learned advocate on record
instance of the
petitioner for correction of an apparent typographical
error.
Both the parties are ad idem and submit that
the typographical error is there ... parties leave is also granted
to the petitioner to correct the typographical error in
paragraph 9 at page 5 to the writ petition and ground
marks and
number of candidates cannot be construed to be mere typographical errors.
No documents were produced to establish such alteration.
37. He further argues
marks and
number of candidates cannot be construed to be mere typographical errors.
No documents were produced to establish such alteration.
37. He further argues
marks and
number of candidates cannot be construed to be mere typographical errors.
No documents were produced to establish such alteration.
37. He further argues
marks and
number of candidates cannot be construed to be mere typographical errors.
No documents were produced to establish such alteration.
37. He further argues
