plaintiffs' learned counsel that there were some
serious typographical errors in the plaint, which required
correction for the purpose of determining the real question ... amendments sought are fundamentally of two nature, viz., (i)
removal of typographical errors and (ii) for clarification and
explanation of the plaintiffs' case
that the
petitioners have attempted to derive advantage of certain
apparent typographical errors in the question paper. Had such
typographical errors been of such consequence ... where the petitioners are trying to derive advantage of
another typographical error inasmuch as the word „past‟ has
been typed in place of the word
that the
petitioners have attempted to derive advantage of certain
apparent typographical errors in the question paper. Had such
typographical errors been of such consequence ... where the petitioners are trying to derive advantage of
another typographical error inasmuch as the word „past‟ has
been typed in place of the word
that the
petitioners have attempted to derive advantage of certain
apparent typographical errors in the question paper. Had such
typographical errors been of such consequence ... where the petitioners are trying to derive advantage of
another typographical error inasmuch as the word „past‟ has
been typed in place of the word
that the
petitioners have attempted to derive advantage of certain
apparent typographical errors in the question paper. Had such
typographical errors been of such consequence ... where the petitioners are trying to derive advantage of
another typographical error inasmuch as the word „past‟ has
been typed in place of the word
that the
petitioners have attempted to derive advantage of certain
apparent typographical errors in the question paper. Had such
typographical errors been of such consequence ... where the petitioners are trying to derive advantage of
another typographical error inasmuch as the word „past‟ has
been typed in place of the word
that the
petitioners have attempted to derive advantage of certain
apparent typographical errors in the question paper. Had such
typographical errors been of such consequence ... where the petitioners are trying to derive advantage of
another typographical error inasmuch as the word „past‟ has
been typed in place of the word
that the
petitioners have attempted to derive advantage of certain
apparent typographical errors in the question paper. Had such
typographical errors been of such consequence ... where the petitioners are trying to derive advantage of
another typographical error inasmuch as the word „past‟ has
been typed in place of the word
that the
petitioners have attempted to derive advantage of certain
apparent typographical errors in the question paper. Had such
typographical errors been of such consequence ... where the petitioners are trying to derive advantage of
another typographical error inasmuch as the word „past‟ has
been typed in place of the word
that the
petitioners have attempted to derive advantage of certain
apparent typographical errors in the question paper. Had such
typographical errors been of such consequence ... where the petitioners are trying to derive advantage of
another typographical error inasmuch as the word „past‟ has
been typed in place of the word
