LTCG of
Rs.2,79,68,49,392/-, based on a typographical error in
Schedule CG of the return of income filed by the office ... Schedule CG was a bona fide
typographical error made by the office of the appeltant's CA
while filing the return of income
occupied properties.
Thus, there is some inadvertent typographical error in
the Annexure-1 (Statement of Article of Charge) of the
chargesheet. However, a thorough reading ... occupied, as mentioned in the
chargesheet, is due to some inadvertent typographical error.
7
For the sake of clarity, the relevant part of the
communication
matter
with the direction to appreciate the challans and the typographical
errors contained in the challans. It is submitted that challan
numbers given ... dismissed. However,
it is simultaneously acknowledged that there had occurred a
typographical error in the AG Audit report/show cause notice
assessee had as the company is
inadvertently done a functionally not
typographical error in accept comparable to
reject matrix where the above assessee ... perused, however the
had inadvertently done a same is not acceptable
typographical error in accept as the company is
reject matrix where the above functionally
replication to the rejoinder stated that due to typographical error the date
i.e. 30.06.2013 was mentioned in the letter and alleged corrigendum issued ... exposed is trying to mislead the Commission
on the pretext of typographical error and filling of corrigendum. The OP state that the cut-off date
perused the record. Counsel for the appellant stated that there is typographical error in the policy, however, the State Commission has not considered this apparent ... amount as claimed by the complainant. In our view, typographical error of adding one Zero after Rs.2,50,000/- would not entail the complainant
instead of Rs. 59,064/- due to typographical error. The OP asked the complainant to provide all the documents so that the corrected maturity ... informed the complainant that there was an inadvertent typographical error in maturity sum assured which had been shown as Rs. 3,00,000/- instead
first floor. This, according to the
complainant, was an inadvertent typographical error, due to which Roman
letter I was, by mistake, shown against floor instead ... ground floor of block 39 and that
due to inadvertent typographical error which have occurred at the time of
feeding to computer from the schedule
letter dated 27.06.2013, clarified that mention of section 153A was a
typographical error. The AO submitted in the remand report that proper
satisfaction was recorded
letter dated 27.06.2013, clarified that mention of section 153A was a
typographical error. The AO submitted in the remand report that proper
satisfaction was recorded
