then that the complainant stated that it was a
typographical error, during evidence CW1 stated that he can produce the
copy of invoice ... from accused and stated that Rs. 2,30,500/ is a
typographical error and he came to know about that error on 22.09.2017,
however
Typographical Error In Para 5 Of The ... vs Vinod Kumar on 19 September, 2018
Author: Sanjay Karol
Bench: Sanjay Karol
Cr. Revision ... date of hearing.
Cr.M.P.M No. 688 of 2016
Typographical error in para 5 of the judgment, dated
2nd June, 2016, titled
respondent submitted that the
amendment was sought only to correct the typographical error
and clerical mistake committed while drafting the complaint and
the trial court ... curing an infirmity,
especially of the nature of clerical or typographical error, which
would not change the nature of the complaint, could be allowed
complainant-respondent. Five separate complaints were filed.
During typing of complaints, typographical error occurred
regarding number and date of cheques.
Admittedly, cheques have been issued ... CRLMP-2915/2017]
Admittedly, in the present case typographical error has been
corrected. Complainant-respondent has not been permitted to
amend the complaint substantially
complainant-respondent. Five
separate complaints were filed. During typing of
complaints, typographical error occurred regarding
number and date of cheques.
Admittedly, cheques have been issued ... complainant to make necessary corrections.
Admittedly, in the present case
typographical error has been corrected. Complainant-
respondent has not been permitted to amend the
complaint
which has
come in the cross-examination of PW1, is a typographical
error. With this, he submitted that both impugned
judgments under revision ... involvement of one
Sri.Aslamsab in the transaction, was a mere typographical
error.
As analyzed above, before making those statements
with respect to Sri.Aslamsab
moved an application for correction/amendment in the complaint,
acknowledging a typographical error in mentioning the cheque numbers as 933525 and
933526 instead ... appellant's contention is based on the accidental typographical error in the
cheque numbers in the legal notice which got transmitted further
accused. Subsequently, the Complainant noticed
that there was a typographical error in the Legal Notice about the year
of payment of amount and therefore ... brining
to the knowledge of the accused about the typographical error and even
the said notice was duly served upon this accused. The Accused even
affirmative and thus, the same
also cannot be termed as a typographical error and accordingly, the
present complaint is not maintainable being filed ... Apex Court observed that "...the term typographical error is
defined as a mistake made in the printed/typed material during a printing/typing
process
that the same has happened only because the same is a
typographical error and there is no reason why the complainant
would contradict his whole ... same is not to be deemed to be a typographical error
that it means that the accused is suggesting that the complainant
is stating true
