directions on February 14, 2017 as according to it, a
typographical error was noticed in the said judgment. On this
day, following order was passed ... This matter has been listed today for directions. A
typographical error was noticed post delivery this judgment
dated 24.12.2016 in the concluding portion. The error
statement dated 21.02.2018", which prosecution covers that the
same is typographical error. This all because they are trying to
conceal/withheld the crucial part ... stated that the above date of
21.02.2018 is a typographical error, as it is matter of record that both
statement under section
respondent submitted that the
amendment was sought only to correct the typographical error
and clerical mistake committed while drafting the complaint and
the trial court ... curing an infirmity,
especially of the nature of clerical or typographical error, which
would not change the nature of the complaint, could be allowed
The Present Case Was Registered On ... vs Pollonji Darabshaw Air 1988 Sc 88 ... on 17
allowed in part'. Thus, the same
being purely a typographical error, the Court has ample
power under Section 362 of CrPC to correct ... legality or propriety of any finding. That
being the case, said typographical error can also be
rectified by this revisional Court since the same
review application. It is an admitted position that there were many typographical errors in the said application. One such error which has offended the learned ... error while using these words. Had it been so, then certainly it could have been corrected when all other errors have been corrected. In typographical
behalf of the
respondent/accused; also for correction of alleged typographical error in
the crossexamination of the revisionist/complainant recorded ... para of the crossexamination of the
petitioner was clearly a typographical error. It is further averred that the
income tax returns and documents relating
order dt. 19.01.2018 in prayer clause of the petition due to
typographical error and for that he has filed an application ... State & Anr.
summoning order dt. 19.01.2018 and due to typographical error
impugned order is mentioned as 30.10.2017. In this regard perusal of
record shows
persons by their names since prior to this incident, was a
typographical error committed during recording of his testimony before
the court. Ld. Addl ... State has
explained the abovesaid submission as a typographical error.
11. Now, it is to be decided whether the abovesaid version is a
typographical error
Trial Court, on bonafide
ground, as there was some typographical error in the statement of the
witnesses. As such, it is argued that imposition ... recorded in their respective
statement as 26.03.2030, which is apparently a typographical error. As
such, in these circumstances, ld. SPP sought adjournment for advancing
arguments
