petitioner-Company,
as non-responsive, on the basis of typographical error in Form-
EXP-1 [General Construction Experience] and without considering
the concerned documents filed ... wrote a letter dated 06.01.2018
and acknowledged that there was a typographical error in one of
the forms of the bid. The petitioner-Company also
According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, due to a
typographical error, the petitioner in paragraph 3 of his plaint filed ... mandatory requirement running into few sentences cannot be
called a typographical error. She also drew the attention of this Court to
paragraph
Typographical Error In Para 5 Of The ... vs Vinod Kumar on 19 September, 2018
Author: Sanjay Karol
Bench: Sanjay Karol
Cr. Revision ... date of hearing.
Cr.M.P.M No. 688 of 2016
Typographical error in para 5 of the judgment, dated
2nd June, 2016, titled
name to the extent of
correction in spelling errors, correction in spelling errors,
factual typographical errors in the factual typographical errors in the
Candidate ... applies only to the extent of correction in spelling error, factual
typographical errors in the candidate's name/Surname, father's
name/mother
directions on February 14, 2017 as according to it, a
typographical error was noticed in the said judgment. On this
day, following order was passed ... This matter has been listed today for directions. A
typographical error was noticed post delivery this judgment
dated 24.12.2016 in the concluding portion. The error
assessee had as the company is
inadvertently done a functionally not
typographical error in accept comparable to
reject matrix where the above assessee ... perused, however the
had inadvertently done a same is not acceptable
typographical error in accept as the company is
reject matrix where the above functionally
typographical mistake on the part of the
Respondent No.1. She submits that only cases where there is a
typographical error on the part ... that in view of the admitted position that there is no
typographical error on the part of the Respondent No. 1, who had
faithfully reproduced
perused the record. Counsel for the appellant stated that there is typographical error in the policy, however, the State Commission has not considered this apparent ... amount as claimed by the complainant. In our view, typographical error of adding one Zero after Rs.2,50,000/- would not entail the complainant
mistake committed certainly does not come within the preview of a typographical error. The term typographical error is defined as a mistake made ... obligation to do cannot be called as a typographical error. As a consequence the plea of typographical error cannot be entertained in this regard since
mistake committed certainly does not come within the preview of a typographical error. The term typographical error is defined as a mistake made ... obligation to do cannot be called as a typographical error. As a consequence the plea of typographical error cannot be entertained in this regard since