Section 392 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 392 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860
392. Punishment for robbery.—
Whoever commits robbery shall be punished with rigorous imprisonment for a term which
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 13906 (3.48 seconds)State Of H.P vs Nirmala Devi on 10 April, 2017
faced trial for offence covered by Sections 328, 392, 397
read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code ( IPC ) alongwith co-accused ... sentence of imprisonment is an
essential sentence under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. To this
sentence a fine may be added and, under
Kaziman Gurung vs State Of Sikkim on 26 July, 2017
under Section 307, Indian
Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter the IPC) was registered at 2010 hrs
against unknown person(s) and investigation taken ... u/s 313 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
(hereinafter the Cr.P.C ) was recorded on 10.06.2015 by the learned
Session‟s Judge
Amarjit Singh vs State Of Nct Of Delhi on 3 November, 2009
2001 has been registered under Sections 394 / 34
of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as the IPC ... IPC is not individual in the sense
as it is under Section 397 of the IPC; Section 397 of the IPC
Rupinder Singh @ Pinda Son Of Onkar Singh ... vs State Of Punjab on 10 October, 2013
whose statement was recorded.
He then added offence under Section 392 IPC, on the basis of
statement of Baljit Singh @ Ghug ... that they had committed offences
punishable under Sections 302 / 392 / 341 read with Section 34 IPC.
On presentation of police report, copies
State Of Maharashtra vs Mahipal Singh Satyanarayan Singh on 11 March, 1996
charges on four counts namely under sections 392 r/w 34 IPC , 392 r/w section 397 IPC ... respondent under section 332 / 34 IPC is not enhanced, by us but that, under section 392 / 34 IPC, is enhanced
Imran @ Akhlakh vs State on 22 April, 2015
IPC was clearly attracted.
36. Accordingly, the conviction of this appellant for offence u/s
120B IPC r/w Section 392 ... offence u/s 411. As per the nominal roll, this appellant has also
been convicted in another FIR No. 1001/2013 u/s 420 IPC
Contention He Relied Upon Judgment; ... vs . on 21 April, 2012
u/s 394 / 34 IPC P.S. Rohini
(IV) FIR No. 463/07 u/s 302 / 394 / 397 / 34 IPC ... u/s 394 IPC P.S. Civil Line
(VI) FIR No. 356/07 u/s 302 / 34 IPC P.S Hauz
State vs . 1). Gulshan Taneja on 28 January, 2016
punishable u/s 397 IPC against accused Gulshan Taneja and separate
charge in respect of offences punishable U/s 302/392 ... U/s 302/392/397/120B/34 IPC ; P.S. Prashant Vihar D.O.D. 28.01.2016
arrested U/s 41.1
State Of H.P. vs Nirmala Devi on 10 April, 2017
faced trial for offence covered by Sections 328, 392,
397 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code ( IPC ) alongwith
co-accused ... sentence of
imprisonment is an essential sentence under
Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. To
this sentence a fine may be added and,
under