Pushpabai Purshottam Udeshi & Ors vs Ranjit Ginning & Pressing Co. (P) Ltd. & ... on 25 March, 1977
Equivalent citations ... Kailasam
Bench: P.S. Kailasam , M. Hameedullah Beg
PETITIONER:
PUSHPABAI PURSHOTTAM UDESHI & ORS.
Vs.
RESPONDENT:
RANJIT GINNING & PRESSING
Ranjit D. Udeshi vs State Of Maharashtra on 19 August, 1964
Equivalent citations: 1965 AIR 881, 1965 SCR (1) 65, AIR 1965 SUPREME COURT ... Wanchoo , J.C. Shah , N. Rajagopala Ayyangar
PETITIONER:
RANJIT D. UDESHI
Vs.
RESPONDENT:
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
DATE OF JUDGMENT:
19/08/1964
BENCH:
HIDAYATULLAH
Narendra Udeshi vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. on 1 October, 2002
Equivalent citations: 2003(1)BOMCR500, (2003)1BOMLR315, 2003ECR569(BOMBAY), 2003(156)ELT819
Hardik P. Udeshi And Anr vs Om Sri Maa Shakti Namah And 3 Ors on 24 January, 2023
Author: R.I. Chagla
Bench ... SUIT NO. 740 OF 2016
Hardik P. Udeshi & Anr. ...Applicants/
Plaintiffs
Versus
Om Sri Maa Shakti I Namah & Ors. ...Defendants
AND
NOTICE
Rajesh Laxmichand Udeshi @Bhatia vs Pravin Hiralal Shah on 16 July, 2012
Author: Chief Justice
Bench: Mohit S. Shah , N.M. Jamdar
kambli 1 appl ... SUMMARY SUIT NO.673 OF 2010
...
Rajesh Laxmichand Udeshi @Bhatia ...Appellant
v/s.
Pravin Hiralal Shah ...Respondent
...
Mr.Sanjay Jain with Mr.Ramesh Jain
reliefs stated in the opening part of this judgment.
9. Mr. Udeshi, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, urged that the Bank ... filing of its written statement in the third reference. Mr. Udeshi also urged that the Bank had failed to make out any case of loss
Trikamdas Udeshi vs Bombay Municipal Corporation on 19 November, 1953
Equivalent citations: AIR1954BOM427, (1954)56BOMLR264, ILR1954BOM727, AIR 1954 BOMBAY 427, 56 BOM LR 264
Author
presumed to have knowledge about
the contents of the episode Ranjit D.
Udeshi vs. State of Maharashtra
reported in AIR 1965 SC 881.
(2) That ... curtained under Article 19(2)
of the Constitution Ranjit D.
Udeshi (supra) relied upon (Para
82).
(6) That forewarning by way of
disclaimer and terms
even on the basis of the findings of the Tribunal.
THE Hicklin-Udeshi tests : Obscenity - 'taken as a whole' and 'in particular ... whole". It is pointed out that though in Ranjit Udeshi's case , Hicklin's test was expressly accepted by our Supreme Court
Udeshi & Ors vs State Of Maharashtra & Anr on 30 June, 2008
Author: Nishita Mhatre
Bench: Nishita Mhatre
vss
IN THE HIGH COURT ... BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4311 OF 2006
D.D. Udeshi & Ors. ... Applicants
V/s.
State of Maharashtra & Anr. ... Respondents
